Newest Additions

The U.S. Supreme Court Passes on Chance to Weigh in on  California’s Climate Change Initiative

By: Christina Tabacco, Associate

Posted: September 17, 2014

 

On June 30th the Supreme Court of the United States declined to grant the petition for certiorari by plaintiff-appellees in the case Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013), cert. den’d 134 S.Ct. 2875 (June 30, 2014) . The plaintiffs sought to strike down a major component of California’s climate change initiative (AB 32),[1] arguing that certain regulations violated the dormant Commerce Clause. The question at the heart of the lawsuit was whether California could regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based on regulators’ unique accounting method called “lifecycle analysis.”

 

Lifecycle analysis, colloquially deemed, “well to wheel accounting” allows regulators to tally the total amount of GHG emissions from sources of automotive fuel (i.e. crude oil and various types of corn and sugar cane ethanol blended gasoline) by including emissions generated during production, refinement and transportation. The law creates declining caps regulating the total amount of GHGs that may be emitted from sources sold in California under the state’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS).

For the full article, please click here.

_______________________________

Subcontractor Coverage Under the Christian Doctrine

By: John Kashuba, Associate
Posted: September 10, 2014

 

 

Blog Post—JEEL-Subcontractor Coverage Under the Christian Doctrine

 

Problem: Recent litigation has produced ambiguity as to whether subcontractors are covered under the Christian doctrine. If this is indeed the case, practitioners advising clients bidding or negotiating for procurement work containing clauses espousing requirements as to the kinds of materials that must be used, or other clauses containing compliance mandates with environmental laws and regulations are strongly encouraged to be hyper-vigilant as to the wording, text, form, and structure of the contract. Any omissions or oversights by agency personnel or contractor must be carefully scrutinized and investigated to avoid problems further down the road.

 

Background: The Christian doctrine has become an indelible and enduring part of procurement jurisprudence, such that many in the field will need little introduction to its basic tenets. As a refresher, the doctrine is a reflection of two major principles. First, the government should not be bound by the unauthorized actions of its agents. Second, the laws and policies governing government procurement enacted by Congress should be respected and followed by all parties. As such, under Christian, required clauses that are omitted from a government contract, intentionally or inadvertently, are read into the contract by operation of law. Over the last 50 years, scholars, practitioners, courts, and administrative boards have struggled to decide what clauses should be covered under this doctrine, and which contractors should be covered . . .

 

For the full article, please click here.

 

_______________________________

 

 JEEL’s Most Recent Publication

Volume 5, Number 2 | Summer 2014

Articles

Green Siting for Green Energy

by Amy Morris, Jessica Owley, and Emily Capello

Balancing Economic and Environmental Goals in Distributed Generation Procurement: A Critical Analysis of California’s Renewable Auction Mechanism (RAM)

by Jessica Wentz

Relieving the Congestion: The Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative

by Michelle Bailey

Notes

Promoting Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy and Managing Environmental Risk: Toward an Adaptive Management Strategy

by Molly A. Masterton

How to Save the Tortoises: Incorporating Wildlife Concerns in Siting of the Utility-Scale Solar Farms

by Hina Gupta

 _______________________________

Solving the Goldilocks Problem: A Market Based Proposal for a More Efficient Feed-in Tariff in Japan

By: Caleb Rosenberg, Article Editor
Posted: March 15, 2014

During the midday hours of May 25, 2012, Germany accomplished an impossible task: nearly fifty-percent of the energy generated in the country came from solar power. Humming along at twenty-two gigawatts, Germany’s solar power plants pumped out electricity with the force of twenty nuclear power stations. Germany’s stunning achievement came with unsustainably high, incentive-based costs. Just over one month later, on June 28, 2012, the German legislature approved cuts to their solar incentives program to prevent costs from spiraling out of control.

Germany maintained an incentive program known as a feed-in tariff through which utilities pay energy producers certain published prices, called tariff rates, for energy. The feed-in tariff incentivized development of solar generating capacity by providing solar producers a special tariff rate (price per kilowatt-hour) above the prevailing electricity market rate. The higher tariff rates guaranteed the solar developer a profit. Utilities that bought electricity

For the full article, please click here.

————————

The Hidden Environmental Impacts of Photovoltaic Panels

By: Adam S. Carlesco, Associate
Posted: March 9, 2014

It is an undeniable fact that renewable sources of energy have been rising tremendously over the past decade and are continuing to grow with nearly one in three new power projects being renewable in nature. While wind energy is leading the pack of renewable technology, solar energy has seen a 52.2% growth between July 2012 and July 2013. While many solar energy proponents continue to portray solar energy sources as a panacea for the growing global energy demand, these technologies carry a hidden environmental cost.

While solar energy only constitutes 0.11% of electricity generation in the U.S., many, including solar power researcher Dr. Richard Perez of the George Washington Solar Institute, believe that solar power is a completely feasible way to ensure full electricity to the American public with the development of large scale solar projects, along with supplements from wind and other renewable resources. What Dr. Perez fails to note, however, is that while solar power provides a source of energy free from the fluctuations of fossil fuel demands and greenhouse gas emissions, solar photovoltaic panel production carries a large upfront pollutant

For the full article, please click here.

 ____________________________

Energy and Environmental Law Paper Series:

Essential Tool, Harmless Distraction, or Unintended Consequence: An Analysis of the Benefit Corporation and its Potential Impact on the Renewable Energy Sector
By: Kate D’Ambrosio
Posted: March 1, 2014

United States LNG Exports: The Current Legal and Economic Landscape
By: Yousef Rahman
Posted: February 1, 2014

GWU JEEL

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers